Chad Anheliger vs Steven Koslow
UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs Malott · Sat 17 Oct 2026 · Bantamweight
Result
✓ Forecast correctSteven Koslow won by SUB Rear Naked Choke · round 3, 4:31
Winner estimate
Model pick: Steven Koslow (65.9%). The model expects the other fighter to win about 34 times in 100 similar fights.
Evidence and reliability
- Chad Anheliger: 5 prior detailed UFC fights
- Steven Koslow: 1 prior detailed UFC fights — limited data
Official forecasts require at least 3 prior detailed UFC fights for both fighters. The estimate is a probability from one model, not a guarantee; small differences between fighters carry real uncertainty.
Why the model leans this way
Locked before the fightSupporting the pick3
- AgeEdge: Steven KoslowChad Anheliger 39.0 yrs, Steven Koslow 29.0 yrs.
- Takedowns landed per roundEdge: Steven KoslowChad Anheliger 0.27, Steven Koslow 1.67.
- ReachEdge: Steven KoslowChad Anheliger 163 cm, Steven Koslow 175 cm.
Working against the pick3
- Striking defenseEdge: Chad AnheligerChad Anheliger 54.1%, Steven Koslow 40.4%.
- Significant strikes landed per roundEdge: Chad AnheligerChad Anheliger 15.20, Steven Koslow 3.67.
- Striking accuracyEdge: Chad AnheligerChad Anheliger 44.0%, Steven Koslow 37.9%.
Method and distance
Method and distance estimates are unavailable for this bout.
Stat comparison
DescriptiveReason through the matchup yourself. The brighter side of each bar marks the fighter with the edge.
Striking
- Significant strikes landedper roundChad Anheliger 15.2, Steven Koslow 3.7. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
- Significant strikes absorbedper round · lower is betterChad Anheliger 14.2, Steven Koslow 17.7. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
- Striking differentiallanded minus absorbed, per roundChad Anheliger +1.0, Steven Koslow -14.0. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
- Striking accuracyshare of significant strikes landedChad Anheliger 44.0%, Steven Koslow 37.9%. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
- Striking defenseshare of opponents’ significant strikes avoidedChad Anheliger 54.1%, Steven Koslow 40.5%. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
- Knockdownsper roundChad Anheliger 0.13, Steven Koslow 0.00. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
Wrestling and grappling
- Takedown attemptsper round · wrestling volumeChad Anheliger 0.73, Steven Koslow 3.00. Edge: Steven Koslow.
- Takedowns landedper round · takedown productionChad Anheliger 0.27, Steven Koslow 1.67. Edge: Steven Koslow.
- Takedown accuracyshare of own attempts completedChad Anheliger 36.4%, Steven Koslow 55.6%. Edge: Steven Koslow.
- Takedown defenseshare of opponents’ attempts stoppedChad Anheliger 27.3%, Steven Koslow —.
- Control timeminutes:seconds per roundChad Anheliger 0:37, Steven Koslow 1:33. Edge: Steven Koslow.
- Submission attemptsper roundChad Anheliger 0.13, Steven Koslow 0.33. Edge: Steven Koslow.
Fight profile
- Finish rateshare of UFC wins by KO/TKO or submissionChad Anheliger 50.0%, Steven Koslow —.
- Wins by KO/TKOUFC winsChad Anheliger 1, Steven Koslow 0. Style difference, no edge.
- Wins by submissionUFC winsChad Anheliger 0, Steven Koslow 0. Style difference, no edge.
- Wins by decisionUFC winsChad Anheliger 1, Steven Koslow 0. Style difference, no edge.
- Average fight timeelapsed time per UFC bout (minutes:seconds)Chad Anheliger 14:56, Steven Koslow —. Style difference, no edge.
- Detailed UFC fightsmore fights = more evidence behind these numbersChad Anheliger 5, Steven Koslow 1. Edge: Chad Anheliger.
The fighters
Chad Anheliger
Ratings
Ratings V2 scores are not available for this fighter yet.
Chin and Cardio · Frozen through October 17, 2026
R1 research scaleSteven Koslow
Ratings
Ratings V2 scores are not available for this fighter yet.
Chin and Cardio · Frozen through October 17, 2026
R1 research scalePost-fight review
Review pending
A written review of what happened versus the locked forecast has not been published for this bout yet.
Simulate in the Lab
The Lab's simulators currently run on a fixed library of historical example fights, so this exact matchup is not available there yet. They are research tools and can disagree with the official forecast.
