Skip to content
FIGHT FORECAST
Matchup

Ode Osbourne vs Cody Durden

UFC Fight Night: Moicano vs Nolan · Sat 31 Oct 2026 · Flyweight · 3 rounds (official UFC listing)

Official forecastLocked 27 Oct 2026, 04:21 UTC

Result

✗ Forecast missed

Cody Durden won by U-DEC · round 3, 5:00

The locked pre-fight forecast below is shown exactly as it was before the event.

Winner estimate

Model pick: Ode Osbourne (53.2%). The model expects the other fighter to win about 47 times in 100 similar fights.

Evidence and reliability

  • Ode Osbourne: 13 prior detailed UFC fights
  • Cody Durden: 17 prior detailed UFC fights

Official forecasts require at least 3 prior detailed UFC fights for both fighters. The estimate is a probability from one model, not a guarantee; small differences between fighters carry real uncertainty.

Why the model leans this way

Locked before the fight
Model pickOde Osbourne53.2%

Supporting the pick3

  • Striking prevention against prior oppositionEdge: Ode Osbourne
    Ode Osbourne 4.52, Cody Durden -0.54.

    Striking prevention compared with opponents’ usual output.

  • ReachEdge: Ode Osbourne
    Ode Osbourne 185 cm, Cody Durden 170 cm.
  • Takedown accuracyEdge: Ode Osbourne
    Ode Osbourne 26.1%, Cody Durden 48.3%.

Working against the pick3

  • Takedowns landed per roundEdge: Cody Durden
    Ode Osbourne 0.24, Cody Durden 1.10.
  • Striking output against prior oppositionEdge: Cody Durden
    Ode Osbourne -7.30, Cody Durden -2.42.

    Striking output compared with opponents’ prior defense.

  • Takedown production against prior oppositionEdge: Cody Durden
    Ode Osbourne -0.63, Cody Durden 0.32.

    Takedown production compared with opponents’ normal allowance.

The model's own locked explanation fields, captured before the fight: what moved the model, not causes. "Against prior opposition" measures compare a fighter with what their opponents usually allow. Opponent-adjusted career evidence; no injury, camp, fight-date strength index or direct 730-day form input. Not prospectively proven.

Method and distance

Separate component · small live sample
Goes the distance59%
KO/TKO24%
Submission18%
Decision59%
Outcome breakdown (who wins × how)
OutcomeOde OsbourneCody Durden
KO/TKO17%7%
Submission5%12%
Decision31%27%

Separate method and distance components with a small live sample. They do not change the winner estimate. The outcome breakdown is an approximation built from the winner estimate and the fight-level finish estimate.

Stat comparison

Descriptive

Reason through the matchup yourself. The brighter side of each bar marks the fighter with the edge.

Biggest statistical gaps

  • Cody Durden controls more: 1:35 per round to Ode Osbourne’s 0:17.
  • Cody Durden has more takedown production: 1.10 takedowns landed per round to Ode Osbourne’s 0.24.
  • Cody Durden brings more wrestling volume: 2.28 takedown attempts per round to Ode Osbourne’s 0.92.

Striking

  • Significant strikes landedper round
    Ode Osbourne 12.3, Cody Durden 14.2. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Significant strikes absorbedper round · lower is better
    Ode Osbourne 13.8, Cody Durden 16.9. Edge: Ode Osbourne.
  • Striking differentiallanded minus absorbed, per round
    Ode Osbourne -1.5, Cody Durden -2.7. Edge: Ode Osbourne.
  • Striking accuracyshare of significant strikes landed
    Ode Osbourne 40.4%, Cody Durden 44.4%. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Striking defenseshare of opponents’ significant strikes avoided
    Ode Osbourne 49.3%, Cody Durden 51.0%. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Knockdownsper round
    Ode Osbourne 0.16, Cody Durden 0.03. Edge: Ode Osbourne.

Wrestling and grappling

  • Takedown attemptsper round · wrestling volume
    Ode Osbourne 0.92, Cody Durden 2.28. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Takedowns landedper round · takedown production
    Ode Osbourne 0.24, Cody Durden 1.10. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Takedown accuracyshare of own attempts completed
    Ode Osbourne 26.1%, Cody Durden 48.3%. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Takedown defenseshare of opponents’ attempts stopped
    Ode Osbourne 65.9%, Cody Durden 56.5%. Edge: Ode Osbourne.
  • Control timeminutes:seconds per round
    Ode Osbourne 0:17, Cody Durden 1:35. Edge: Cody Durden.
  • Submission attemptsper round
    Ode Osbourne 0.08, Cody Durden 0.18. Edge: Cody Durden.

Fight profile

  • Finish rateshare of UFC wins by KO/TKO or submission
    Ode Osbourne 60.0%, Cody Durden 28.6%. Edge: Ode Osbourne.
  • Wins by KO/TKOUFC wins
    Ode Osbourne 3, Cody Durden 1. Style difference, no edge.
  • Wins by submissionUFC wins
    Ode Osbourne 0, Cody Durden 1. Style difference, no edge.
  • Wins by decisionUFC wins
    Ode Osbourne 2, Cody Durden 5. Style difference, no edge.
  • Average fight timeelapsed time per UFC bout (minutes:seconds)
    Ode Osbourne 8:11, Cody Durden 10:22. Style difference, no edge.
  • Detailed UFC fightsmore fights = more evidence behind these numbers
    Ode Osbourne 13, Cody Durden 17. Edge: Cody Durden.

Career UFC totals from fights before Sat 31 Oct 2026 only (pre-fight cutoff; this bout and anything after it are excluded); latest included fight Sat 11 Jul 2026. These are descriptive numbers, not the model's locked inputs, and they are not opponent-adjusted. Small samples move a lot.

The fighters

Ode Osbourne

UFC record 5-7 · 13 detailed UFC fights · Balanced / Hybrid

Ratings

Ratings V2Rated
Striking (offense)66
Power85
Striking defense71
Takedown defense77
WrestlingProvisional measure66

Ratings V2 descriptive 0–100 scores (13 detailed fights; as of Sat 21 Feb 2026). Not win probabilities or rankings. Missing values stay unavailable.

Chin and Cardio · Frozen through October 17, 2026
R1 research scale
ChinEvidence: DEVELOPING80.2
CardioEvidence: DEVELOPING69.2

Source: R1 public_candidate_display · status: Research candidate · as of Sat 17 Oct 2026. Separate frozen research scale; fights after October 17, 2026 are not reflected.

About these ratings

Ratings are domain-specific descriptive scales. Equal point differences across different domains do not imply equal absolute skill differences.

Striking (offense) · Ratings V2
Ratings V2 striking-offense score built from recorded significant strikes landed per round, significant-strike accuracy and significant-strike differential.
Power · Ratings V2
Recorded knockdown and KO/TKO-win threat under the Ratings V2 contract (knockdowns per round, KO/TKO win rate); not literal measured punching force.
Striking defense · Ratings V2
Recorded strike avoidance (striking defense) and bounded absorption (strikes absorbed per round) under the Ratings V2 contract.
Takedown defense · Ratings V2
Recorded defense against incoming takedown attempts (takedown defense rate) under the Ratings V2 contract.
Wrestling · Ratings V2
Ratings V2 wrestling-offense score: recorded takedowns landed per round and takedown accuracy. Not ground control or complete grappling.
Chin · R1 research scale
Exposure-adjusted recorded knockdown resistance. This is not a direct biological measurement of chin, recovery, or injury resistance.
Cardio · R1 research scale
Recorded later-round striking activity and effectiveness retention. This is not a direct physiological fitness measurement.

Ratings V2 scores follow each fighter's latest recorded state; R1 research-scale scores are frozen through 17 Oct 2026. Recovery is separate metadata, not a rating. No combined rating exists.

Fighter profile →

Cody Durden

UFC record 7-9-1 · 17 detailed UFC fights · Wrestling Heavy · Control Grappler

Ratings

Ratings V2Rated
Striking (offense)69
Power65
Striking defense69
Takedown defense65
WrestlingProvisional measure89

Ratings V2 descriptive 0–100 scores (17 detailed fights; as of Sat 11 Jul 2026). Not win probabilities or rankings. Missing values stay unavailable.

Chin and Cardio · Frozen through October 17, 2026
R1 research scale
ChinEvidence: ESTABLISHED78.3
CardioEvidence: ESTABLISHED64.7

Source: R1 public_candidate_display · status: Research candidate · as of Sat 17 Oct 2026. Separate frozen research scale; fights after October 17, 2026 are not reflected.

About these ratings

Ratings are domain-specific descriptive scales. Equal point differences across different domains do not imply equal absolute skill differences.

Striking (offense) · Ratings V2
Ratings V2 striking-offense score built from recorded significant strikes landed per round, significant-strike accuracy and significant-strike differential.
Power · Ratings V2
Recorded knockdown and KO/TKO-win threat under the Ratings V2 contract (knockdowns per round, KO/TKO win rate); not literal measured punching force.
Striking defense · Ratings V2
Recorded strike avoidance (striking defense) and bounded absorption (strikes absorbed per round) under the Ratings V2 contract.
Takedown defense · Ratings V2
Recorded defense against incoming takedown attempts (takedown defense rate) under the Ratings V2 contract.
Wrestling · Ratings V2
Ratings V2 wrestling-offense score: recorded takedowns landed per round and takedown accuracy. Not ground control or complete grappling.
Chin · R1 research scale
Exposure-adjusted recorded knockdown resistance. This is not a direct biological measurement of chin, recovery, or injury resistance.
Cardio · R1 research scale
Recorded later-round striking activity and effectiveness retention. This is not a direct physiological fitness measurement.

Ratings V2 scores follow each fighter's latest recorded state; R1 research-scale scores are frozen through 17 Oct 2026. Recovery is separate metadata, not a rating. No combined rating exists.

Fighter profile →

Post-fight review

Review pending

A written review of what happened versus the locked forecast has not been published for this bout yet.

Simulate in the Lab

The Lab's simulators currently run on a fixed library of historical example fights, so this exact matchup is not available there yet. They are research tools and can disagree with the official forecast.

Open the Lab

Model details
Model
Winner C-Primary v1
Training data through
2026-09-19
Locked at
27 Oct 2026, 04:21 UTC
Forecast reference
f041ad85cd21