Andre Fili vs Kai Kamaka III
UFC Fight Night: Allen vs Duncan · Sat 10 Oct 2026 · Featherweight
Result
✗ Forecast missedAndre Fili won by KO/TKO Kick · round 2, 0:22
Winner estimate
Model pick: Kai Kamaka III (54.9%). The model expects the other fighter to win about 45 times in 100 similar fights.
Evidence and reliability
- Andre Fili: 27 prior detailed UFC fights
- Kai Kamaka III: 6 prior detailed UFC fights
Official forecasts require at least 3 prior detailed UFC fights for both fighters. The estimate is a probability from one model, not a guarantee; small differences between fighters carry real uncertainty.
Why the model leans this way
Locked before the fightSupporting the pick3
- AgeEdge: Kai Kamaka IIIAndre Fili 36.0 yrs, Kai Kamaka III 31.0 yrs.
- Significant strikes landed per roundEdge: Kai Kamaka IIIAndre Fili 17.79, Kai Kamaka III 26.53.
- Prior UFC lossesEdge: Kai Kamaka IIIAndre Fili 13, Kai Kamaka III 3.
Working against the pick3
- Significant strikes absorbed per roundEdge: Andre FiliAndre Fili 20.84, Kai Kamaka III 29.13.
- ReachEdge: Andre FiliAndre Fili 188 cm, Kai Kamaka III 175 cm.
- Prior UFC win rateEdge: Andre FiliAndre Fili 48.1%, Kai Kamaka III 33.3%.
Method and distance
Method and distance estimates are unavailable for this bout.
Stat comparison
DescriptiveReason through the matchup yourself. The brighter side of each bar marks the fighter with the edge.
Biggest statistical gaps
- Andre Fili brings more wrestling volume: 1.48 takedown attempts per round to Kai Kamaka III’s 0.87.
- Kai Kamaka III is more accurate: 59.1% of significant strikes to Andre Fili’s 37.9%.
- Kai Kamaka III lands 26.5 significant strikes per round to Andre Fili’s 17.8.
Striking
- Significant strikes landedper roundAndre Fili 17.8, Kai Kamaka III 26.5. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
- Significant strikes absorbedper round · lower is betterAndre Fili 20.8, Kai Kamaka III 29.1. Edge: Andre Fili.
- Striking differentiallanded minus absorbed, per roundAndre Fili -3.0, Kai Kamaka III -2.6. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
- Striking accuracyshare of significant strikes landedAndre Fili 37.9%, Kai Kamaka III 59.1%. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
- Striking defenseshare of opponents’ significant strikes avoidedAndre Fili 49.5%, Kai Kamaka III 55.0%. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
- Knockdownsper roundAndre Fili 0.10, Kai Kamaka III 0.07. Edge: Andre Fili.
Wrestling and grappling
- Takedown attemptsper round · wrestling volumeAndre Fili 1.48, Kai Kamaka III 0.87. Edge: Andre Fili.
- Takedowns landedper round · takedown productionAndre Fili 0.68, Kai Kamaka III 0.47. Edge: Andre Fili.
- Takedown accuracyshare of own attempts completedAndre Fili 46.2%, Kai Kamaka III 53.8%. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
- Takedown defenseshare of opponents’ attempts stoppedAndre Fili 72.0%, Kai Kamaka III 55.0%. Edge: Andre Fili.
- Control timeminutes:seconds per roundAndre Fili 0:41, Kai Kamaka III 1:01. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
- Submission attemptsper roundAndre Fili 0.06, Kai Kamaka III 0.07. Edge: Kai Kamaka III.
Fight profile
- Finish rateshare of UFC wins by KO/TKO or submissionAndre Fili 30.8%, Kai Kamaka III 0.0%. Edge: Andre Fili.
- Wins by KO/TKOUFC winsAndre Fili 4, Kai Kamaka III 0. Style difference, no edge.
- Wins by submissionUFC winsAndre Fili 0, Kai Kamaka III 0. Style difference, no edge.
- Wins by decisionUFC winsAndre Fili 9, Kai Kamaka III 2. Style difference, no edge.
- Average fight timeelapsed time per UFC bout (minutes:seconds)Andre Fili 10:42, Kai Kamaka III 10:38. Style difference, no edge.
- Detailed UFC fightsmore fights = more evidence behind these numbersAndre Fili 27, Kai Kamaka III 6. Edge: Andre Fili.
The fighters
Andre Fili
Ratings
Ratings V2 scores are not available for this fighter yet.
Chin and Cardio · Frozen through October 17, 2026
R1 research scaleKai Kamaka III
Ratings
Ratings V2 scores are not available for this fighter yet.
Chin and Cardio · Frozen through October 17, 2026
R1 research scalePost-fight review
Published- What happened
- Fili knocked Kamaka out just 22 seconds into Round 2. The opening round was competitive, but Fili hurt Kamaka with a clean punch at the start of the second and then landed a head kick that ended the fight.
- What the model got right
- The model only gave Kamaka a 54.9% edge, correctly treating this as a very close matchup rather than a strong favorite. It also flagged Fili’s large reach advantage, better UFC win rate, stronger takedown defense and much lower strike absorption as meaningful concerns.
- What the model missed
- The slight Kamaka lean placed more weight on youth, activity, fewer UFC losses and striking defense than on Fili’s veteran striking advantages. Those concerns proved more important to the actual result than the factors producing Kamaka’s narrow model edge.
- Takeaway
- A 54.9% prediction should be communicated as a lean, not a confident pick. This fight is a good example of why the concern side of the model explanation can be nearly as informative as the final probability in close matchups.
Simulate in the Lab
The Lab's simulators currently run on a fixed library of historical example fights, so this exact matchup is not available there yet. They are research tools and can disagree with the official forecast.
